Re: [-empyre-] t[otalic]ime again

["melinda rackham" <melinda@unsw.edu.au>]

> ...mel, r u referring 2 the idea here that space is s.sentially
> collapsible|inconstant & how this relates 2  the idea that
> virtuality|networked arenas r conceptualised as unique, rather than
> contextualised as fundamentally trajectoric?

yep.. new, fresh, different, when its really all the same stuff  -the same
old space repackaged/packetted.
its almost as silly as trying to write a unique thesis.. margaret wertheim
did a nice job of talking about spiritual space being repackaged as
cyberspace.
maybe ive been around computers for too long  but  i 've come to belive in
finity, in limits, to an end of possibility, to everything being a
mathematical probaility.
not that it isnt  interresting to see how may ways you can look at
something..  but sometimes the loop is too short..
m